Back to Home

Sources & Research

Every statistic on this site should be traceable. This page documents the sources behind our claims and the methodology behind our calculations.

In February 2026, we conducted a deep-research audit of every statistical claim on capveri.com. Several claims that were previously attributed to formal industry studies could not be traced to publicly accessible primary sources. This page reflects that audit. Where sources are weak, we say so.

Industry Statistics

Third-party data points cited across the marketing site. Each claim includes its source, reliability rating, and links to the best available references. Reliability reflects whether a primary, methodology-disclosing source was located.

40% of CAM reconciliations contain material errors

low reliability

Attributed to Tango Analytics (2023) via secondary sources

Widely cited in industry content. The original Tango Analytics report has not been independently located or verified. Secondary sources (PredictAP, Springbord) restate the figure without linking to the underlying study, methodology, or definition of "material error." We cite this figure as commonly referenced in industry discussions, not as a verified statistic.

No primary study located. Definition of 'material' and methodology not disclosed.

15-20% of billed CAM charges recovered by tenant auditors

low reliability

Springbord (2025), PredictAP (2026)

Stated in vendor educational content. No primary JLL, Deloitte, or Big 4 report publishing this figure with methodology was located in publicly available 2020-2026 materials. The figure is presented as industry insight without disclosed sample size, asset class mix, or audit protocol.

No primary study or dataset located. Commonly cited but unverified.

3-5% of operating expense recoveries lost annually

low reliability

Agora Real (2024), industry estimates

Agora Real states "annual third-party reconciliations often uncover 3-5% in overcharges or misclassifications." This frames the figure as audit findings, not specifically landlord under-collection. No specific BOMA study was located for this claim despite prior attribution to "BOMA industry research."

No primary BOMA study located. Nearest source is a vendor educational article.

$25K+ per year for ERP/API integration (Yardi)

high reliability

Yardi Systems — official interface program

Yardi's official "Become an Interface Partner" page states participation requires an annual fee per interface. The Yardi France page explicitly states "$25,000 per interface per year." The US page confirms the fee structure exists with variation by interface type.

Primary source: official Yardi program page with published pricing.

MRI integration costs (UK G-Cloud procurement data)

medium reliability

MRI Software — UK public procurement pricing

UK G-Cloud pricing documents show MRI Property Management at £55,000/year entry-level (500 leases, 10 users) and list integration line items including RESTful API Web Service at £10,560 and various supplier integrations at £8,040-£13,400.

Primary source (official pricing). UK-specific; may not represent US commercial terms.

400+ hours per year on manual CAM reconciliation

low reliability

Datagrid (2025)

Datagrid blog states "manual CAM reconciliation consumes 40+ hours monthly," which annualizes to 480+ hours/year. No disclosed study design, sample size, or benchmarking methodology. Likely illustrative positioning for an AI vendor.

No disclosed methodology. Vendor marketing claim.

Invoice cycle time: 9.2 days manual vs. 3.1 days automated

low reliability

PredictAP (2026)

PredictAP reports invoice processing cycle times comparing manual and automated workflows. Figures come from vendor marketing content without disclosed methodology or sample size.

No disclosed methodology. Vendor marketing claim.

Invoice cost: $12.88 manual vs. $2.78 automated

low reliability

PredictAP (2026)

PredictAP reports per-invoice processing costs comparing manual and automated workflows. Figures come from vendor marketing content without disclosed methodology.

No disclosed methodology. Vendor marketing claim.

$10.3M savings for 3,500-lease portfolio

low reliability

Nakisa (2025)

Nakisa cites potential savings from lease administration automation across a large portfolio. Vendor case study without disclosed audit methodology.

Vendor marketing claim. No disclosed methodology or peer review.

Houston office vacancy: 26.3% (Q4 2025)

high reliability

Partners Real Estate — Q4 2025 Quarterly Market Report

Partners Real Estate publishes quarterly Houston office market reports with vacancy rates by submarket. The Q4 2025 report shows 26.3% overall office vacancy with submarket extremes of 49.1% (Greenspoint) and 37.8% (FM 1960).

Primary source: licensed brokerage firm publishing periodic market data.

2-5% RSF increase from BOMA 2024 adoption

medium reliability

Gensler (2024), Building Engines

Gensler and Building Engines estimate that adopting the BOMA 2024 standard (ANSI/BOMA Z65.1-2024) may increase rentable square footage by 2-5% due to outdoor amenity measurement changes.

Industry estimates from credible firms. Actual impact varies by building configuration.

CPA busy season drives reconciliation delays

medium reliability

CPA Trendlines (2024)

CPA Trendlines reports on seasonal workload patterns in accounting firms. January-April busy season creates bottlenecks for commercial real estate reconciliations that depend on CPA review.

Established accounting industry publication. Seasonal pattern is well-documented.

CapVeri-Specific Claims

These figures are derived from internal customer data and standard CRE calculations. They are not third-party research and have not been independently validated.

Modeled recovery range per building: ~$5.9K-$35.3K/year

Modeled from a 200,000 SF building using IREM office opex benchmark ($11.15/SF in 2023), CPI-adjusted to 2025 dollars, and scenario leakage rates of 0.25%-1.5%. This is an assumption-driven estimate, not a universal outcome claim.

Modeled ROI range: ~25x to ~50x at $699/audit

Calculated from modeled recovery range versus per-audit cost ($699/audit, 1–5 tier). For a mid scenario (0.75% leakage, ~$17.7K recovery), modeled ROI is ~25x. Actual ROI depends on lease structure, CAM pool size, and data quality.

Modeled building value impact range at 7% cap rate

Using the modeled recovery range ($5.9K-$35.3K), the implied value lift at a 7% cap rate is roughly $84K-$505K per building. Actual cap rates vary by market and asset type.

Modeled portfolio leakage range

Portfolio estimates should be modeled from each property's CAM pool and scenario rates rather than a fixed per-building average.

28% of tenants discover CAM errors without an auditor

Cited from JLL industry reports on tenant self-discovery of billing errors. Primary source not independently verified in our February 2026 audit.

$445,500 additional NOI on 250K RSF building from BOMA 2024

Modeled by CapVeri assuming 3% RSF increase on a 250,000 SF building at $11.15/SF IREM benchmark OpEx, with resulting NOI increase capitalized at 7%. This is a scenario illustration, not a guarantee.

Standards Referenced

ANSI/BOMA Z65.1-2024

Office building measurement standard. CapVeri gross-up and area calculations comply with the 2024 edition including outdoor amenities measurement updates.

www.boma.org

California SB 1103

California commercial lease disclosure requirements effective January 1, 2025. CapVeri generates documentation compliant with SB 1103 30-day response deadlines.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

IRS § 6001 / Rev. Proc. 98-25

Federal record retention requirements. CapVeri retains financial records for 10 years per IRS requirements for commercial real estate documentation.

IRS §162 — Routine Maintenance Safe Harbor

Defines deductible trade or business expenses, including the routine maintenance safe harbor used to distinguish operating expenses from capital expenditures in CAM classifications.

www.law.cornell.edu

IRS §263(a) — Capital Expenditures

Defines capital expenditure rules that determine when a cost must be capitalized rather than expensed. Critical for CapEx/OpEx classification in CAM reconciliations.

www.law.cornell.edu

ASC 842 — Lease Accounting

FASB lease accounting standard requiring operating and finance lease recognition on the balance sheet. Affects how CAM expenses are classified and reported.

www.fasb.org

IREM Operating Expense Benchmarks

Institute of Real Estate Management publishes annual operating expense benchmarks used as the basis for CAM cost reasonableness testing and recovery modeling.

www.irem.org

ICSC Shopping Center Standards

International Council of Shopping Centers provides CAM and operating expense guidance for retail properties, including anchor tenant exclusion conventions.

www.icsc.com

Texas Property Code § 93.012

Texas statute governing commercial lease disclosure and tenant rights related to common area maintenance charges.

California Civil Code §1950.9

Enacted by SB 1103. Requires landlords of qualifying commercial tenants to provide itemized CAM statements and respond to documentation requests within 30 days.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Legal & Case Law

Court cases, legislation, and legal references cited in our content. Case citations are for educational purposes and do not constitute legal advice.

Medic Pharmacy, LLC v. AVK Properties, LLC (Harris County, 2022)

Harris County case involving CAM gross-up disputes in a high-vacancy commercial property. Illustrates the financial impact of incorrect gross-up calculations in Texas markets.

Mata v. Avianca, Inc. (S.D.N.Y., 2023)

Federal court case where attorneys were sanctioned for submitting AI-generated legal citations that cited nonexistent cases. Established precedent for verification requirements when AI tools are used in legal filings.

storage.courtlistener.com

Clear Lake Center v. Garden Ridge (Texas, 2013)

Texas case involving CAM charge disputes between a commercial landlord and anchor tenant. Addressed issues of expense pass-through interpretation in multi-tenant retail properties.

SB 1103 Full Bill Text

California Senate Bill 1103, effective January 1, 2025. Creates new disclosure and documentation requirements for landlords of qualifying commercial tenants.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

California B&P Code §18000(a)

Defines "qualified commercial tenant" for purposes of SB 1103 protections. Businesses with fewer than 100 employees may qualify for enhanced CAM disclosure rights.

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Market Data & Reports

Market research reports and data sources used for regional vacancy rates, operating expense benchmarks, and industry trends.

Partners Real Estate — Houston Office Q4 2025

Quarterly market report covering Houston office vacancy rates, absorption, and submarket performance. Source for Houston 26.3% vacancy and submarket data.

partnersrealestate.com

HCAD 2025-2026 Reappraisal Plan

Harris County Appraisal District reappraisal schedule and methodology. Affects tax expense projections in CAM reconciliations for Harris County properties.

hcad.org

BOMA 2024 Operating Benchmark Report

Annual operating expense benchmarks for office buildings. Used for CAM cost reasonableness comparisons.

www.boma.org

CREModels — CAM Reconciliation Deadlines

Analysis of CAM reconciliation deadline patterns and common causes of late delivery across commercial portfolios.

www.cremodels.com

Professional & Educational References

Law firm analyses, industry publications, and educational resources cited across our blog and resource articles.

BDO — Lease Audit Spotlight: Gross-Up Adjustments

BDO advisory publication explaining gross-up provision mechanics and common audit findings in commercial lease reconciliations.

www.bdo.com

Parr Brown — Leasing Basics: Gross-Up Provisions

Legal analysis of gross-up provisions in commercial leases, including common drafting issues and tenant protections.

parrbrown.com

MBM LLC — CAM Gross-Up Clauses

Practical guide to gross-up clauses in commercial leases, covering calculation methods and common landlord-tenant disputes.

www.mbmllc.com

CalLawyers — New Protections Under SB 1103

California Lawyers Association analysis of SB 1103's impact on commercial tenant rights and landlord disclosure obligations.

calawyers.org

Carlton Fields — SB 1103: What Landlords and Tenants Need to Know

Law firm analysis of SB 1103 compliance requirements, including documentation timelines and qualifying tenant thresholds.

www.carltonfields.com

Holland & Knight — New Changes to California Commercial Leasing

Legal briefing on SB 1103 and its implications for commercial lease administration in California.

www.hklaw.com

XFinBench — Financial AI Benchmark

Academic benchmark evaluating LLM accuracy on financial calculation tasks. Demonstrates that current AI models achieve only 38.9% accuracy on multi-step financial math, supporting the case for deterministic calculation engines.

arxiv.org

RIW — Audit Rights and Restrictions

Legal strategies for understanding and defending audit rights in commercial leases, including common lease clause pitfalls.

www.riw.com

Fiserv — Reconciliation Whitepaper

Industry whitepaper on financial reconciliation automation, including time and cost benchmarks for manual vs. automated processes.

www.fiserv.com

J.P. Morgan — What Are CAM Charges in CRE?

Introductory guide to common area maintenance charges in commercial real estate, covering standard inclusions and landlord-tenant allocation methods.

www.jpmorgan.com

IREM Oregon — CAM Reconciliation: Art or Science

Professional presentation on CAM reconciliation best practices, including common errors and recommended verification procedures.

iremoregon.org

FASB Conceptual Framework

Financial Accounting Standards Board conceptual framework for financial reporting. Provides the theoretical basis for expense classification in CAM reconciliations.

www.fasb.org

Methodology Notes

ROI Calculation

ROI figures compare modeled annual recovery ranges against per-audit cost ($699/audit, 1–5 tier). Modeled recovery uses benchmark assumptions (200,000 SF, IREM office opex benchmark, CPI adjustment, and scenario leakage rates). Results vary by lease complexity and process quality.

Building Value Impact

We calculate building value impact using the standard income-capitalization method: increased NOI divided by cap rate. We use a 7% cap rate as representative of mid-market commercial properties. Actual cap rates range from 4% to 10%+ depending on market, asset class, and property condition.

Source Verification Process

In February 2026, we attempted to trace every statistical claim on this site to a publicly accessible primary source (published study, survey, or official documentation). Claims rated “low reliability” could only be found in secondary blog posts or vendor marketing without disclosed methodology. Claims rated “high reliability” have primary sources with published documentation. We continue to update these ratings as better sources become available.

Corrections Policy

If you believe any claim on this site is inaccurate or inadequately sourced, contact us at hello@capveri.com. We will investigate and update this page.